Sunday, February 4, 2007

A good word about World Book

Welcome! Thanks for visiting my blog -

For this entry, I'd like to follow up on our recent class discussion about encylopedia formats and evaluation of Grolier's, Brittanica, and World Book on-line. Overall, Brittanica got the class vote for presentation and especially its grade-level organization, while Grolier's Multi-Media was praised highly for visual content.

I'd like to include here a good word about World Book (WB) and its information breakdown. WB cuts up dense information on a broad topic into multiple sections with subtitles, helping frame main ideas. There's even an option to "print this section" at the end of each - a possible paper saver. I don't disagree with observations about Grolier's and Britannica, but I didn't want to overlook this appealing quality found in WB.

Overall, I also preferred the writing in WB. In comparing written entries on same topics, I felt WB's tone, organization, and depth of information would likely be most helpful and satisfying for middle schoolers on up; possibly younger groups as well. Granted, this a rather subjective evaluation.

More than anything, I wonder how kids themselves would rank each site and its elements. I'd love to hear back from any and all in that regard!

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Yes, it will be interesting to hear what the kids have say. They are the end users and if they find it easy to use and the it has the information that they are searching for they will use it. Anna